← Back to Blog

Building Trust Through Robust Protection Frameworks

Finerty Team
open-finance security data-protection cybersecurity compliance

As Open Finance expands data sharing across financial ecosystems, security becomes the critical foundation that enables innovation while protecting clients, institutions, and the broader financial system from emerging threats. Traditional security models, designed for closed banking systems, are evolving into comprehensive frameworks that secure data flows across multiple parties, jurisdictions, and technologies.

The Industry-Led Evolution of Financial Data Protection

Without requiring formal Open Finance legislation, the advancement of security has become a market and regulatory imperative. Financial institutions-tasked with safeguarding sensitive data while enabling innovation-are inherently motivated to implement robust security frameworks that build trust and ensure compliance across the Open Finance ecosystem.

Phase 1: Addressing Current Security Gaps and Vulnerabilities

Current State: Today, Open Finance operates with fragmented security standards across banks, fintechs, and third-party providers, creating multiple points of vulnerability. The threat landscape includes:

  • API vulnerabilities that allow attackers to intercept or steal sensitive data through injection attacks, broken object-level authorization, or improper authentication[1]
  • Third-party risks where inadequately vetted vendors introduce vulnerabilities, and over-permissioned access exposes sensitive financial data[1]
  • Fraud targeting the human layer through phishing, social engineering, and fake apps that trick users into sharing credentials or authorizing fraudulent transactions[2]
  • Data privacy concerns as massive volumes of financial data flow across platforms, raising risks of breaches, misuse, and regulatory non-compliance[3]

The Central Bank of Ireland emphasizes that while PSD2 mandates data sharing for payment accounts, no legal basis exists for savings, investment, or mortgage data-creating inconsistent protection across account types.[4]

Security Breakthrough: In the first phase of transformation, institutions implement foundational security controls: strong authentication using OAuth 2.0 and mutual TLS, encryption of all API traffic with TLS 1.3, and real-time monitoring to identify irregular activity. The Open Finance Data Security Standard (OFDSS) emerges as a compliance framework with 79 security requirements across 13 control domains, addressing software development, incident management, cryptography, and data minimization.[5][1]

  • Benefits: 60-70% reduction in successful API attacks, early detection of fraudulent activities, standardized security baselines across providers, and improved regulatory compliance posture
  • Technology: Leverages API security gateways, behavioral analytics, and multi-factor authentication to protect data in transit and at rest

Phase 2: Standardized Frameworks and Regulatory Compliance

Next Logical Step: As institutions adopt basic security controls, regulatory frameworks like the EU’s Financial Data Access Regulation (FiDAR) establish comprehensive governance requirements for Open Finance data sharing.

  • FiDAR compliance mandates that data users must be authorized financial institutions or financial information service providers (FISPs), with security policy documents and detailed risk assessments required for authorization[6]
  • Permission dashboards enable customers to monitor and manage data access in real-time, with the right to withdraw permissions instantly[6]
  • Data protection integration ensures GDPR compliance, with data deletion requirements when no longer necessary and prohibitions on processing for advertising purposes[6]

Regulatory Perspective: This phase delivers transformative oversight capabilities. National competent authorities gain investigatory and sanctioning powers, with administrative fines up to €250,000 annually for individuals and 3% of average daily turnover for legal persons. The framework aligns with DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) requirements, ensuring operational resilience across the ecosystem.[6]

  • Benefits: Clear accountability frameworks, standardized security expectations across all participants, enhanced consumer trust through transparency, and significant deterrent effect through enforcement powers
  • Market Impact: Only vetted, compliant providers can access financial data, reducing systemic risk and protecting consumers from fraudulent actors

Phase 3: AI-Powered Predictive Security and Zero-Trust Architecture

Vision for the Future: Once Open Finance frameworks mature, security evolves from reactive defense to predictive threat prevention-using AI to anticipate and neutralize attacks before they materialize.

  • AI-powered threat detection analyzes patterns across billions of API calls to identify anomalies, predict attack vectors, and automate response protocols in milliseconds
  • Zero-trust architectures ensure that no entity-internal or external-is trusted by default, with continuous verification of every access request and dynamic risk scoring
  • Integrated security ecosystems coordinate protection across banks, fintechs, and third parties, sharing threat intelligence and orchestrating unified defense responses

Comprehensive Protection: Open Finance security becomes invisible yet impenetrable. Advanced behavioral biometrics authenticate users through typing patterns, device usage, and transaction behaviors. Homomorphic encryption enables data analysis without decryption, protecting privacy while enabling innovation. Automated compliance monitoring ensures continuous adherence to evolving regulations across jurisdictions.

  • Benefits: 90% reduction in successful fraud attempts, near-zero data breach incidents, real-time threat neutralization, and seamless security that doesn’t impede user experience
  • Systemic Resilience: The financial ecosystem becomes self-healing, with automated failover, instant threat isolation, and predictive capacity planning that prevents service disruptions

Sharing the Responsibility-Collective Security Models

The security improvements and risk reductions generated create value for all participants. Institutions can structure shared security models-threat intelligence exchanges, joint penetration testing, and common security infrastructure-that distribute costs while elevating protection standards across the ecosystem.

This ensures that even smaller fintechs can achieve enterprise-grade security, creating a level playing field that fosters innovation while maintaining systemic safety.

From Defense to Assurance: The Next Frontier

The framework outlined above addresses data protection and threat prevention. The next evolution will be security assurance as a service-where independent entities provide continuous security validation, certification, and insurance for Open Finance participants, creating a transparent security marketplace that enables clients to make informed choices about data sharing risks.


In summary: Even as Open Finance expands data sharing exponentially, security frameworks are evolving from fragmented controls to predictive, AI-powered protection systems-transforming financial data security from a cost center to a competitive advantage. Each phase builds practical resilience and trust, positioning the Open Finance ecosystem as more secure than traditional banking while enabling unprecedented innovation.